By Andrew Gleeson
A daunting Love appreciably rethinks God and evil. It rejects theodicy and its impersonal notion of cause and morality. religion survives evil via a astonishing love that resists philosophical clarification. Authors criticised contain Alvin Plantinga, Richard Swinburne, Marilyn McCord Adams, Peter van Inwagen, John Haldane, William Hasker.
Read Online or Download A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil PDF
Best ethics books
First released in 2000. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa corporation.
The 3rd version of Ethics in Finance provides an authoritative and wide–ranging exam of the main moral concerns in finance. This re-creation has been elevated and punctiliously up-to-date with huge insurance of the hot monetary situation and the very most recent advancements in the monetary international.
The paintings of Michel Foucault has been tremendous influential in fields as various as philosophy, heritage, cultural experiences, sociology and sexuality reviews. In his later paintings, Foucault grew to become to the query of ethics. operating again via background, throughout the Christian interrogation of wish to the origins of the self within the texts of classical Greece, Foucault tried to conceive of ethics as an artwork of the self, as an aesthetics of lifestyles and as a convention of liberty.
- Essays on Ethics and Method (British Moral Philosophers)
- On Benefits (The Complete Works of Lucius Annaeus Seneca)
- Angelic Troublemakers: Religion and Anarchism in America (Contemporary Anarchist Studies)
- Cultivating Conscience: How Good Laws Make Good People
Extra resources for A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil
Perhaps that goes to show how strong is the attraction of ruling philosophical ideas. In any event, if the approach embodied in greater good thinking (or in Adams’s organicism) is rejected, both sides of the argument will have to think again: the whole nature of the problem, and of what serious thought about it consists in, needs to be radically reconsidered. But how else can the argument go on? Dostoevsky’s Ivan has shown the way with a challenge that might be appropriated by atheists. On the other side, how can the believer proceed if not armed with all the apparatus of greater goods and so on?
Why else do we think nations have a responsibility to abide by arms control measures? If Dr Frankenstein’s creation, loaded up with an unpredictable free will gadget, turns on his maker and others, should the doctor be free of all responsibility? In deciding to create beings of such destructive potential, while being wholly ignorant of their likely behaviour, then (however unavoidable that ignorance) God did not merely take a risk; he acted recklessly. He played Russian roulette with the lives of children.
It is not true that the alternative means there is no serious, truth-regarding, ‘cognitive’ thought, no legitimate claims to truth or knowledge, that there will be only arbitrary and irrational preference, ill-disciplined emoting, propaganda and so on. The alternative existential conception does not aspire to neutrality, allows non-argumentative forms of justification – such as The Greater Good 29 appeals to conscience or humanity, or to the influence of literature, art and personal example and experience – and thus admits the relevance of what is contingent and individual.
A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil by Andrew Gleeson
- Read e-book online Ways into the Logic of Alexander of Aphrodisias (Philosophia PDF
- Download PDF by Marina Gorlach: Phrasal Constructions and Resultativeness in English: A